Speculation about their alleged strained relationship has been rife since the Italian celebrity chef, 48, was accused of ‘inappropriate and intimidating behaviour’.

Numerous allegations regarding ‘unacceptable’, ‘distressing’ and ‘horrendous’ experiences with D’Acampo emerged earlier this month following a bombshell ITV News investigation.

As a result, ITV said it ‘has no plans to work with’ him in the future, while two of his upcoming shows were reportedly shelved by the broadcaster.

D’Acampo has firmly denied the allegations, saying he finds the claims levied against him ‘deeply upsetting’.

In wake of the controversy, focus has fallen on the TV star’s longstanding friendships with the likes of Gordon Ramsay and Fred Sirieix.

Ramsay revealed he has ‘checked in’ with D’Acampo after the allegations emerged (Instagram/@iamginodacampo)

Earlier this month, it was reported that Ramsay was ‘no longer on speaking terms’ with his fellow chef and had distanced himself from D’Acampo after raising ‘concerns’ about his behaviour.

It was also claimed that two years ago, the Hell’s Kitchen host had ‘spoken up about things he didn’t think were okay’ in terms of D’Acampo’s alleged conduct.

Sources told the MailOnline earlier this month that this had led to a ‘fractured’ relationship between the pair, while Ramsay was said to have been ‘horrified’ by the allegations published by ITV News.

However, the British restaurateur, 58, has now insisted the rumours that he has washed his hands of D’Acampo are untrue.

While discussing the opening of his Lucky Cat restaurant in London with The Standard, Ramsay revealed that he has been in touch with both of his former co-stars.

“I have reached out to Gino, checked in to make sure he and the family were doing okay,” he said. “Fred too.”

Ramsay’s camp also previously denied claims that he had ‘orchestrated a smear campaign’ against D’Acampo.

The trio have been a staple on our TV screens for the last few years (ITV)

His spokesperson told The Standard that the speculation was ‘utter nonsense’ and ‘ridiculous’, adding: “It is ridiculous to think anyone in Studio Ramsay or Gordon’s personal team wants to prolong this story – it’s of no benefit to anyone!”

D’Acampo called time on Gordon, Gino and Fred’s Road Trip in March 2023 and revealed he would not be returning for a planned fifth series due to ‘contract complications’.

In an Instagram post announcing his departure at the time, the This Morning regular wrote: “I decided not to film any more Gordon, Gino and Fred Road trips.

“The reason is very simple – nothing to do with Gordon or Fred, the friendship is very strong.”

He went on to say: “Because contracts start to become very complicated and very stressful, I personally value the friendship with Gordon and Fred so much that I would rather the friendship than arguments with the contract.

“So I have decided not to do it anymore because I want to be friends with the boys for many, many years ahead.”

D’Acampo and Sirieix instead teamed up for the ITV series Gino and Fred: Emission Impossible last year, where they headed on an ‘epic eco-friendly adventure’ across Austria and Croatia.

Josiah Hughley was one of the three alleged gang members convicted of murdering 29-year-old father Bradley Coleman.

The New Orleans teacher and coach was shot dead when trying to put air in his tires at a Gwinnett County gas station on 10 July 2022.

Coleman was visiting his parents in Georgia, and wanted his daughter to spend some time with her grandparents.

Just after noon, he visited the petrol station to pump up his tires when a black passenger vehicle pulled up beside him.

The individuals inside the car tried to rob Coleman’s vehicle but, instead, shot and killed him.

Hughley was believed to be the shooter, while David Booker was his armed support, and Miles Collins was the getaway driver.

Three men were involved in the killing of a 29-year-old father at a gas station in Georgia (Police handout)

Due to a prosecution mistake in 2023, a judge granted a retrial for 15 January 2025.

On 28 January 2025, the jury reached guilty verdicts for each defendant.

As shown in the clip above, Hughley appears to briefly stare at his lawyer while the guilty counts are being read out.

The father leaves behind a young daughter (Handout)

“It has been two years, six months, 18 days, four-and-a-half hours since they took our beloved Bradley,” Vanessa Harris, Coleman’s aunt said.

“I still remember the day it happened, like it happened today, and parts of it still haunt me at this moment.

“Their heinous crimes have completely impacted and changed our lives forever.

Hughley kept looking at his lawyer in court (11Alive)

“I cannot even begin to describe the feelings of disgust I have for each of them because they were not man enough to go out there and get a job and buy the car that they want.

“They hunted my nephew down like a wounded animal and shot him dead for a car. For a car.”

She continued: “I have no pity for either one of them. May they live the rest of their miserable lives behind bars, never to walk the grounds again.

“My sister lost her son. My brother-in-law lost his son. My nephew lost his brother.

“My beautiful niece lost her father. And they get to just sit here?

“No. They need to go to prison for the rest of their lives. No pity. Now, send them away to their forever homes: prison.”

All three defendants were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

As tensions between world leaders rise and talk of World War III intensifies, a video has been created to demonstrate just how disastrous nuclear war could be.

YouTuber Zack D. Films has created a shocking simulation that details exactly what would happen if the biggest nuclear bomb ever created was dropped on New York City.

The world’s largest nuclear explosion ever took place in 1961, that of course was the Russian hydrogen bomb called the ”Tsar Bomba’, or as the western world knows it – the ‘Tsar Bomb’.

All-Russia Exhibition Centre in Moscow displaying the Tsar Bomba (TATYANA MAKEYEVA / AFP) (Photo by TATYANA MAKEYEVA/AFP via Getty Images)

But it wasn’t until almost 60 years later that footage was released of the huge blast.

Dubbed the ‘King of Bombs’, the Tsar Bomb was developed between 1956 and 1961, while the Soviet Union was in the middle of an nuclear arms race with the US.

It was said to be 3,300 times as destructive as the bomb that devastated Hiroshima, made up of a hydrogen bomb with 50 megatons – or 50 million tons – of explosives.

When it was tested in October 1961, the Tsar Bomb released a mushroom cloud that was 60km high.

Now, the popular content creator Zack and his team put together a short video to explain how it would look if the Russians wanted to drop the bomb on the US’ most populous city. Take a look:

“If the world’s biggest nuclear bomb landed in New York City, the 50 megaton explosion would instantly vaporize everything within a two mile radius,” the video says.

“The blast wave would flatten buildings up to 20 miles away, turning skyscrapers into rubble, and a fireball over five miles wide would ignite everything in its path.

“The shock wave would shatter windows as far as New Jersey and the mushroom cloud would rise 40 miles into the air.

“Radiation would contaminate the area for decades, leaving no survivors in.”

Let’s hope Putin and Trump agree to never press the big red button! (Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)

Let’s hope Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump don’t get into a war that leads to one of the two pressing the big red button…

But to know what New York would be up against, let’s detail a little more on the Tsar Bomb.

During the test in 1961, the Soviet Union stationed cameras on the ground and on board two Russian aircrafts which caught the moment the bomb caused a huge fireball in the sky.

“The testing of an exceptionally powerful hydrogen load … confirmed that the Soviet Union is in possession of a thermo-nuclear weapon with power of 50 megatons, 100 megatons and more,” said a narrator over footage of the test which was released in 2021.

On Sunday (March 3), the 2025 Oscars are set to take place with heated debate already taking place online as to which movies released in the year have seemingly been snubbed.

But what about some of the most controversial Academy Award wins in history? Well, this week’s UNILAD RANKED presents five wins which faced the most backlash – in order of oldest to most recent.

1973 – Marlon Brando declines Best Actor for The Godfather

Brando won the Academy Award for Best Actor at the 45th Academy Awards in 1973 for his portrayal of Vito Corleone in The Godfather however, he didn’t attend the ceremony, instead sending a woman named Sacheen Littlefeather in his place to accept – or rather, decline – the award.

Littlefeather – a member of the Indigenous American group the Apache and president of the National Native American Affirmative Image Committee – explained Brando was ‘regretfully’ turning down the award in protest of ‘the treatment of American Indians today by the film industry and on television in movie reruns and also with recent happenings at Wounded Knee’.

The Wounded Knee Massacre – also known as the Battle of of Wounded Knee – took place in 1890 and saw around three hundred Lakota – Native American – people killed by US Army soldiers.

Littlefeather’s speech concluded: “I beg at this time that I have not intruded upon this evening and that we will in the future our hearts and our understandings will meet with love and generosity. Thank you on behalf of Marlon Brando.”

1995 – Pulp Fiction losing Best Picture to Forrest Gump

Four Weddings and as Funeral, The Shawshank Redemption, Quiz Show, Forrest Gump and Pulp Fiction were nominated for Best Picture at the 67th Academy Awards, but the award was ultimately taken home by Forrest Gump – directed by Robert Zemeckis and starring none other than Tom Hanks.

The win was divisive as many considered Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction bolder and more modern, the film receiving the Palme d’Or and critical acclaim.

On the other hand, despite being considered more mainstream, Forrest Gump was a bigger hit in the box office.

One Twitter user wrote: “I am always amazed when anybody takes the Oscars seriously, for any reason. Forrest Gump beat Pulp Fiction. That’s all you need to know.”

“It’s not hard to see why Forrest Gump captivated audiences and Oscars in 1995. But “Pulp Fiction” is one of the best written and most revolutionary movies in cinematic history. Maybe Forrest Gump fit the Academy mold. But Pulp Fiction is the true classic,” another argued.

Hanks even addressed the controversy, telling The New York Times in 2022 while Pulp Fiction is ‘a masterpiece without a doubt,’ Forrest Gump’s ‘magic legs’ scene acts as ‘a moment of undeniable heartbreaking humanity’, defending the film as ‘not just running along to Duane Eddy’s ‘Rebel Rouser’.”

Pulp Fiction fans coming for Forrest Gump (Miramax Films)

2006 – Crash winning Best Picture over Brokeback Mountain

The 78th Academy Awards saw Munich, Good Night, and Good Luck, Capote, Brokeback Mountain and Crash nominated for Best Picture.

Adapted from the 1997 short story by Annie Proulx, Brokeback Mountain stars Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger as Jack Twist and Ennis Del Mar who’re hired as sheep herders and end up falling in love.

Their love affair is ultimately made torturous due to the pair being forced to keep their relationship a secret as a result of the intense homophobia present at the time and both marrying their girlfriends.

Despite Lee telling Indie Wire he was told by the stage manager to stick around in the wings – insinuating the film would win the award – Best Picture was ultimately won by Paul Haggis’ Crash.

And while Brokeback Mountain may’ve secured awards for Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Original Score at the Academy Awards, many were outraged over it not also taking home Best Picture – Lee saying he ‘thinks’ it lost out as a result of its centring around a gay love story, as quoted by The Hollywood Reporter.

A Facebook user called Every Oscar Ever wrote: “The fact that Crash beat Brokeback Mountain for Best Picture at the 78th Academy Awards will always go down for me as one of the most inexplicable moments in The Academy’s history.”

Another commented: “WRONGED by a mile…a stolen Oscar was absolutely the truth. The movie was spellbinding, touching and so loving. It was shocking to be topped by Crash. But it did win Oscars for Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Original Score. They just didn’t have the guts to honor it as Best Picture – though it surely was!”

Many argued Brokeback Mountain should’ve won Best Picture too (Focus Features)

2013 – Life of Pi winning Best Cinematography and Best Visual Effects

Life of Pi really shook up the 85th Academy Awards and in more ways than one. In a more positive sense, it won a staggering number of awards, however, not just one but two proved controversial.

VFX supervisor Bill Westenhofer’s acceptance speech for the film’s Best Visual Effects award was cut short preventing him from fully addressing the issues within the industry and precarious nature of the job – issues of which only further emphasized when the VFX studio responsible for the film’s visual effects named Rhythm & Hues filed for bankruptcy shortly after the Oscars.

The awarding of Best Cinematography to the film also led to backlash given the film was so largely constructed of digital effects, cinematographer Christopher Doyle telling Blouin News: “I’m trying to work out how to say this most politely, and no offense to – I don’t know [director Ang Lee] personally – but what a total f**king piece of s**t.”

Doyle slammed the film winning the award as ‘a f**king insult to cinematography’, arguing: “What it says to the real world is it’s all about us, we have the money, we put the money in, and we control the image. “

He resolved: “That’s not cinematography […] You’ve lost cinema. This is not cinema and it’s not cinematography.”

Heaven forbid the fallout if – or when – a film which heavily uses AI ends up winning the category…

Life of Pi was released in 2012 (20th Century Fox)

2017 – La La Land mistakenly announced as winner of Best Picture over Moonlight

The 89th Academy Awards proved controversial not necessarily because of the film which won the award, but as a result of the wrong film being announced as the winner.

Presenter Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway were mistakenly given the envelope for Best Actress instead of Best Picture leading Beatty to announce La La Land as the winner when the correct recipient was actually Moonlight.

Moonlight producer Jordan Horowitz quickly hopped on stage to clear up the confusion, but it didn’t stop the incident becoming known as ‘envelopgate’.

As one Twitter user resolved: “The most exciting oscars moment that wasn’t will smith’s slap.”

Other controversial moments include Bradley Cooper losing the Best Actor Oscar to Rami Malek, Shakespeare in Love winning over Saving Private Ryan in 1999 and Chariots of Fire winning Best Picture in 1982.

What do you think is going to happen this year?