Super Bowl fans think they've spotted a 2025 conspiracy and it's blown our minds

Super Bowl fans think they’ve spotted a 2025 conspiracy and it’s blown our minds

Super Bowl fans think they've spotted a 2025 conspiracy and it's blown our minds

Super Bowl LIX will feature the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles with conspiracy theorists saying the match was always happening

NFL fans preparing to sit down and watch Super Bowl LIX reckon they have stumbled across a conspiracy theory. But it’s one that has divided the community as the big sporting showdown arrives.

And it all comes down to the NFL seemingly knowing who was going to be playing in the game, happening at the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, from the very beginning. Or so we’re told.

Yes, we’re talking about the Super Bowl logo controversy which has reared its head for 2025 as the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles look to battle it out for the Lombardi Trophy on Sunday (9 February).

All eyes will be on Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce and if they can win a third Super Bowl in a row – a ‘three-peat’ as it’s known in the sporting world – with the latter’s pop star girlfriend Taylor Swift hoping it’ll be a trio of victories she can celebrate with her partner.

But over on the wonderful world of Reddit, chatter has started around the colours used in the official logo for Super Bowl LIX; something that was decided upon long before the teams were known.

Taking over the Pat McAfee Show Official subreddit, NFL fans were busy chatting through the conspiracy about the colours used.

Is the conspiracy true? (Don Juan Moore/Getty Images)

Is the conspiracy true? (Don Juan Moore/Getty Images)

That’s because, once again, the main colours you can see in the logo mirror those worn by the two teams taking part, with the Chiefs’ red and the Eagles’ green forming the majority of the design.

It’s not the first time the colours have matched up, either, hence the growth of such a conspiracy. Two years ago when the Chiefs beat the Eagles the colours were also green and red, albeit different shades of this year’s creation.

And with the internet being the internet, some claim the NFL is involved in a (baseless) secret plan to maximise its own back pockets by deciding all of this in advance. Yes, really.

The Caesars Superdome where Super Bowl LIX was taking place (Michael Owens/Getty Images)

The Caesars Superdome where Super Bowl LIX was taking place (Michael Owens/Getty Images)

The problem with the conspiracy, outside of being totally baseless, is that it had a major blip in 2024.

With a purple and orange design, you might have been thinking we could have had the Baltimore Ravens face off against the Detroit Lions.

Instead, we had the red and gold of the San Francisco 49ers up against the red and white of the Chiefs. Unlucky, lads.

“People want to believe there’s some sort of grand conspiracy when there isn’t,” one Redditor wrote about the blip when discussing this year’s colours.

Responding, one person cheekily wrote: “That sounds like something someone who is in on the conspiracy would say.”

And a third said: “But the conspiracy was true until [NFL Commissioner] Roger Goodell heard what fans were up to and changed it up last second. Its true until it’s not true, then when it’s not true, it’s a conspiracy for changing. Makes sense… if you just don’t think.”

That’s enough of the internet for one day, we reckon.
Super Bowl fans think they’ve spotted a 2025 conspiracy and it’s blown our minds Read More
Titanic viewer spots awkward editing error 28 years after release that you'll now see 'all of the time'

Titanic viewer spots awkward editing error 28 years after release that you’ll now see ‘all of the time’

Titanic viewer spots awkward editing error 28 years after release that you'll now see 'all of the time'

A Titanic super fan pointed out an awkward mistake in the film

The next time you sit down to watch Titanic, all you’re going to be thinking about is this one filming mistake.

Of course, every film has their mistakes, just like that famed scene in Squid Game 2 where you can clearly see a camera man up and close in one of the most tense shootouts ever seen.

But when you think about a historical (and mildly accurate) film, you never expect for there to be any room for mistakes like that. Well, we’re only human, and even those who work in post-production are prone to missing things too.

To be honest, it’s nothing major, but it’s still a mistake that was obviously accidentally left in the scene.

For those of you who have no idea what I’m talking about, it’s time to shatter the glass and open your eyes to the Titanic scene in question.

A TikToker who is dedicated to all things Titanic called Raf Avila, aka Titanic Guy Raf Avila on social media, went into detail about a specific moment in the James Cameron flick.

He shared that the filming crew had made a blunder one particular scene involving main character Jack Dawson, who was played by the fabulous Leonardo DiCaprio.

Can you spot the error? (TikTok/@raf_avila)

Can you spot the error? (TikTok/@raf_avila)

In the clip, which has been watched nearly 200,000 times, Raf shows viewers a moment when Jack walks through a glass door as he’s expected to dine with the fancy higher class people for dinner.

However, as the door is opened for him, the glass’ reflection very clearly shows a camera operator staring right back.

Raf said in the clip: “We all know the scene when Jack is getting ready to go to dinner. Now, I want you to pay close attention to the door and tell me if you spot anything here.

“So, Jack is going into the grand staircase – but did you spot anything? You can clearly see a camera man right there in the window for all to see.

“Did you ever notice that? Now you’re going to notice that all of the time.”

Damn, you’re right Raf. I will be noticing it every time and then I’ll also ruin the scene for everyone I watch it with by pointing it out to them.

Anyway, TikTok viewers didn’t know how to take this new bite of information, with some even choosing it be annoyed that the error was discovered.

One wrote: “So what? We all know it’s a film. There are always errors in any movie,” as another defended: “There’s literally no way to avoid that.”

Someone else shared: “I always look in reflections for bloopers like this.”

One commenter was stunned, writing: “All the 20928362 times I’ve seen the movie and never had noticed!! Haha.”
Titanic viewer spots awkward editing error 28 years after release that you’ll now see ‘all of the time’ Read More
NFL team owner recalls Vladimir Putin's chilling comment after taking $25,000 Super Bowl ring

NFL team owner recalls Vladimir Putin’s chilling comment after taking $25,000 Super Bowl ring

NFL team owner recalls Vladimir Putin's chilling comment after taking $25,000 Super Bowl ring

Vladimir Putin is famously a fan of sports

Here is the unlikely crossover story between an expensive piece of Super Bowl memorabilia and the President of Russia.

As the owner of the New England Patriots, businessman Robert Kraft is no stranger to success – with his side being six-time winners of the Super Bowl. However, the 83-year-old only has five Super Bowl winning rings to show for six wins.

The other ring is hanging out in Russia, allegedly in the possession of none other than Vladimir Putin. But how did this happen?

An example of a Super Bowl ring, worn by Tom Brady (John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

An example of a Super Bowl ring, worn by Tom Brady (John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Did Vladimir Putin really ‘steal’ Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl ring?

If you’re like me, you may have seen this story and wondered ‘What on Earth is a Super Bowl ring?’… so let’s explain.

Rather than receiving a boring old medal, players on the winning team at the Super Bowl get a gold ring which features their team logo and a hell of a lot of diamonds.

It’s estimated the rings can cost around $30,000 (£24,000) to $50,000 (£40,000), because it’s America and things can never be done in halves over there.

Now, given the current political climate, the idea of an official NFL memorabilia making the journey east would seem very unlikely these days. However, the US and Russia formerly had better relations during the early to mid 2000s.

Vladimir Putin and Robert Kraft seen together, centre left (ALEXANDER NIKOLAYEV/AFP via Getty Images)

Vladimir Putin and Robert Kraft seen together, centre left (ALEXANDER NIKOLAYEV/AFP via Getty Images)

It’s during this period that Kraft visited Russia alongside a number of business associates. Fresh of the back of winning his third Super Bowl in 2005, Kraft was donning his winners ring for all to see – with the $25,000 (£19,950) piece of jewellery capturing the attention of Putin.

Reports of what happened next has varied over the years, however, Kraft states the interaction went as follows: Putin tries the ring on, gave a chilling assessment of its capabilities and then pocketed the item for good measure.

Recalling the incident in a 2013, Kraft said: “I took out the ring and showed it to [Putin]. And he put it on and he goes, ‘I can kill someone with this ring’.

“I put my hand out and he put it in his pocket, and three KGB guys got around him and walked out.”

The whereabouts of the ring and its exchange has resurfaced numerous times over the years, with Kraft later being told it was in the best interest of US and Russian relations for the ring to stay in Moscow as a gift.

The businessman even released a statement in 2005 claiming it was a gift to Putin as a ‘symbol of the respect and admiration’ for the Russian people.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin has also weighed in on the subject, offering to purchase Kraft a replacement after his 2013 comments.

The last time Kraft addressed the topic was during Netflix’s The Roast of Tom Brady in 2024, where he said: “And one more thing. In case, Vladimir Putin, you’re watching, give me my f**king ring back, will you?”

NFL team owner recalls Vladimir Putin’s chilling comment after taking $25,000 Super Bowl ring Read More
Man who was offered interview for The Apprentice reveals 'insane' way he filled out application form

Man who was offered interview for The Apprentice reveals ‘insane’ way he filled out application form

Man who was offered interview for The Apprentice reveals 'insane' way he filled out application form

Tom, a comedian, decided to try his hand at meeting Sir Alan Sugar

A man intentionally created an ‘insane’ application for The Apprentice, and talked his viewers through how it went for him.

Tom Ratcliffe is a UK comedian who decided to take things to the next level when he filled out an application form for one of the most business-savvy TV shows in the UK.

Tom explained in his video posted on Instagram: “Six years ago this week I got formally asked to interview for The Apprentice series 15, after I filled out the application form in the most insane way imaginable.

Comedian Tom took initiative when applying to The Apprentice (Instagram/@Tomratcliffehanger)

Comedian Tom took initiative when applying to The Apprentice (Instagram/@Tomratcliffehanger)

“If you’re ever wondering why the people on The Apprentice are quite, so bad, and stupid, I proved that they deliberately target mad people.”

So, how did he do it?

He went on to say that for the ‘name’ section, he wrote that he was called ‘Colin Goosewary’ and that he didn’t ‘know why’ he chose such a name but you’ve got to admit that it’s got a ring to hit.

Then, he tacked the employment question, for which he claimed to be a ‘self-employed entrepreneur’.

He then had to ‘state all qualifications, giving all details of establishments attended’ and he answered: “I gave myself nineteen GCSEs, including an A* in Social Media Studies.”

He also put the school down as ‘Thornhill Community Academy’, which is ‘the school from Educating Yorkshire’ TV show about children who are struggling with their learning in working class areas.

Then, Tom gave himself ‘a degree in Genetic Engineering from the University of Toronto’ to spice things up.

How would Sir Alan Sugar react to Tom? (BBC)

How would Sir Alan Sugar react to Tom? (BBC)

But his tomfoolery didn’t stop there (did you see what I did there?)

He went on to share that his salary amounted to: “Between you and me, it’s well over £100,000, but if Revenue & Customs are involved, it’s far less than that.”

While he answered ‘no’ to having previously worked for the BBC before, he did come up with an elaborate story about having worked outside of the UK.

To this, he told the application: “I went to Prague for a weekend, on a poorly organised stag do last month. The stag visited sixteen brothels, which the tour guide said was a new record.”

Now, when applying to the show, they go on to ask ‘Why should you be Lord Sugar’s business partner?’ and while anyone who is truly applying to further their business and to come up with innovating products might answer this one with something like, ‘To set a new standard for the industry’, Tom instead said: “I’m a big business b*****d like Sir Alan, and don’t take no for an answer.”

He continued: “I guarantee I will make more money than any business partner he’s ever had. My ideas are unique – I can give Sir Alan some sort of legacy he can actually be proud of.”

Oof, he’s going up against the Sugar, and that type of confrontation would not be too pretty.

Then, he was asked what makes him ‘different’ from other applicants, to which he called himself a ‘big business dog’ and he will ‘bite the face off the opposition to get ahead’ and will give ‘110%, 8 days a week,’ even though he admitted that he doesn’t ‘do weekends’.

His other answers were equally as bizarre, particularly when he said that he found out about the application process via a ‘man at a bus stop’, but it’s clear that he’s committed to providing the most out there application form to date.

Sadly, while his application progressed to the next round and he was asked to attend an interview with a form of ID, otherwise he wouldn’t ‘be let into the building’, Tom was unable to attend due to the fact that he couldn’t get a fake passport quick enough via the dark web.

So, his adventure ended there.

I really wish I’d have seen Colin Goosewary in front of Sugar, but it wasn’t to be.

Man who was offered interview for The Apprentice reveals ‘insane’ way he filled out application form Read More
Former WWE star reveals mammoth 18,000 calorie a day diet he followed with huge McDonald's order

Former WWE star reveals mammoth 18,000 calorie a day diet he followed with huge McDonald’s order

Former WWE star reveals mammoth 18,000 calorie a day diet he followed with huge McDonald's order

That big body needs big fuel

While the advice for ordinary people like you and I is to stick to about 2,000 calories per day, the people who compete athletically for a living tend to need a whole lot more.

Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps would eat as much as 12,000 calories a day, the equivalent of six days worth of food, as fuel for his sport, while plenty of other athletes eat comparable amounts.

It’s all about fitting the diet to the person, as most of us will spend our days sitting and walking around, while those who push their body to the limits and have to do a lot of intensive training will need more fuel.

Former WWE star Big Show, real name Paul Wight, once sat down in the talkSPORT studio and told them that at the height of his wrestling career he was knocking back up to 18,000 calories a day.

Big guys can handle bigger portions, and Big Show's portions were larger than most. (Taylor Hill/WireImage)

Big guys can handle bigger portions, and Big Show’s portions were larger than most. (Taylor Hill/WireImage)

As his name suggests the bloke is a big guy, standing at over two metres tall, and made his name in wrestling off the back of his gigantic stature.

For a man like that, you’d expect a diet with more calories in it just because there’s more of him that needs powering, but Big Show was also expected to put on a big show in the ring, and needed a body that could do that.

As such, he would often go to McDonald’s and place a huge order, and then sometimes go to Taco Bell afterwards for another big serving of something to chow down on.

He said: “My calorie intake back in the day, which was a lot of empty, bad calories, because I used to just eat whatever I wanted in massive amounts.

“I’d probably say it was somewhere between 13 to 18,000 calories a day. You get Big Macs you know, I get three or four Big Macs and then I get fries, I get a shake, I get apple pies, and probably fish sandwich or two.

Back at the height of his career he could eat half the McDonald's menu and still have space for Taco Bell. (Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

Back at the height of his career he could eat half the McDonald’s menu and still have space for Taco Bell. (Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

“Then you’d go to Taco Bell and get like 20 tacos.”

It’s not the healthiest or most nutritious diet in the world but when you’re as big as the Big Show it can do the job, at least for a time.

“You can do that when you’re younger, when you’re still going to be big, but as you get older you realise ‘Well, I can’t really eat like that anymore,'” the former WWE star explained.

He said that he now feels like ‘I eat like a mouse’, saying he would have ‘about 10 ounces of protein’ and some vegetables to ‘try to eat halfway decent’.

He recounted how a beef pie with gravy was ‘the most delicious concoction’ he’d ever had in his life, and after taking two bites he ordered another one.

Former WWE star reveals mammoth 18,000 calorie a day diet he followed with huge McDonald’s order Read More
How to watch US coverage of Super Bowl in the UK so you can see iconic adverts and film trailers

How to watch US coverage of Super Bowl in the UK so you can see iconic adverts and film trailers

How to watch US coverage of Super Bowl in the UK so you can see iconic adverts and film trailers

The Kansas City Chiefs take on the Philadelphia Eagles in tonight’s Super Bowl

Here is everything you need to know ahead of watching tonight’s Super Bowl in the UK.

Arguably the US equivalent of the Champions League final, the 59th Super Bowl will see the Kansas City Chiefs take on the Philadelphia Eagles at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, an event which I’m told is the biggest day in the American Football calendar.

And because this is America, a massive sports game wouldn’t be complete without multiple iconic adverts, new film trailers and a dazzling half-time show from one of the industry’s biggest stars.

So, here is everything you need to know about watching tonight’s game.

It's game day in New Orleans (Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

It’s game day in New Orleans (Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

How to watch Super Bowl 59 – Super Bowl LIX – in the UK tonight (9 February)

First thing you need to know about watching the Super Bowl is it’s going to be a late one.

The game will be broadcast live on Sky Sports NFL tonight. Coverage begins at 10:45pm GMT with the main event kicking off at around 11:30pm.

If you don’t have a Sky package but fancy getting the full authentic experience, then you can stream the game via an NFL Game Pass via DAZN which features full US broadcast with commentary, commercials, and Kendrick Lamar’s half-time show.

How to watch Super Bowl for free in the UK tonight

If you’re not too bothered about getting an all-American experience tonight, after all the biggest moments will no doubt be online by time the rest of the UK wakes up, then you can catch the game on ITV1 and streaming services via ITVX.

Just make sure you’ve got your TV licence paperwork in order if you’re streaming the game live, as nothing kills the mood quite like being slapped with a £1,000 fine.

Everything you need to know about tonight’s Super Bowl game

The face off against Patrick Mahomes’ Chiefs and Jalen Hurts’ Eagles in New Orleans is a rerun of the 2023 Super Bowl, which the Chiefs clinched an exciting 38-35 win.

Should the Chiefs win tonight’s game and they’ll win the title for the third year in a row, a massive ‘three-peat’ which has never before been achieved in NFL history.

An achievement which the likes of Tom Brady missed out on during his glittering career.

Who will prevail? (Don Juan Moore/Getty Images)

Who will prevail? (Don Juan Moore/Getty Images)

As previously mentioned, the half time entertainment is coming courtesy of Lamar, whose Drake diss-track ‘Not Like Us’ recently won big at the Grammys – alongside a guest appearance from SZA. Meanwhile Post Malone will be headlining a Tailgate Concert, available via YouTube.

President Donald Trump will also reportedly be in attendance for the game, as will pop superstar Taylor Swift, who will be supporting her boyfriend Travis Kelce.
How to watch US coverage of Super Bowl in the UK so you can see iconic adverts and film trailers Read More
Oasis fans say their 'dreams have been crushed' after tickets for reunion tour cancelled by Ticketmaster

Oasis fans say their ‘dreams have been crushed’ after tickets for reunion tour cancelled by Ticketmaster

Oasis fans say their 'dreams have been crushed' after tickets for reunion tour cancelled by Ticketmaster

Some people who’ve bought tickets have had them cancelled

Some Oasis fans have been left in despair after Ticketmaster cancelled their tickets for the reunion tour on the grounds that they might be bots.

A number of fans who bought tickets recently received an email from Ticketmaster telling them that they believed bots had been used to buy their tickets.

These fans were told to fill out a form to sort out the issue, and some are worried about getting their tickets back.

The Oasis ticket sale proved to be controversial after dynamic pricing for the reunion tour saw some fans having to pay significantly more money for tickets due to massive demand.

The gigs were almost guaranteed to be a sell-out with huge demand for tickets but some which were marketed at £155 ended up going for up to £355 instead.

The tickets for Oasis sold out quickly, but some people have had their tickets cancelled. (Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

The tickets for Oasis sold out quickly, but some people have had their tickets cancelled. (Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

The government is now looking into the matter of dynamic pricing.

As for those genuine fans who had their tickets cancelled due to Ticketmaster thinking they were bots, some of them have said it feels like their ‘dreams have been crushed’.

Music fan Leighah Conroy told PA that her friend had bought their tickets back in August last year, but on 7 February they’d received an email from Ticketmaster claiming they’d ‘identified that bots were used to make this purchase’.

“To say that we’re bots is totally out of order for Ticketmaster because we tried all day to get the tickets,” she said.

“Our heads have been pretty battered these past 24 hours.

“I felt sick in the stomach. It’s a band you’ll never experience or see again and it’s been on my bucket list for years. It just feels like my dreams have been completely crushed.”

Ticketmaster sent forms out to people so they could say they weren't bots. (Jaque Silva/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Ticketmaster sent forms out to people so they could say they weren’t bots. (Jaque Silva/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Leighah added that her group had also spend money on hotels and travel, and said it was ‘totally outrageous’ that their tickets had been cancelled.

A fan over in Spain who spent around £3,000 so her family of four could travel to London and see Oasis said she felt ‘shocked then angry’ at her tickets being cancelled, adding that she’d spent five hours trying to sort things out with Ticketmaster through emails and social media.

Marta Bonnet, 48, thought the email saying her tickets had been cancelled was fake at first and criticised Ticketmaster’s approach.

She said: “I know there are a lot of platforms trying to use bots to resell the tickets, but there must be another way to take control of this situation, which is not to take (it out on) all the people that are buying the tickets in a legal form.”

A spokesperson from Ticketmaster said: “Anyone who has been contacted and believes a refund was made in error has been sent a form to fill in for the tour’s promoters to review.”

Oasis fans say their ‘dreams have been crushed’ after tickets for reunion tour cancelled by Ticketmaster Read More
Fans break down the 'hidden meanings' behind Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl halftime performance

Fans break down the ‘hidden meanings’ behind Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime performance

Fans break down the 'hidden meanings' behind Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl halftime performance

Fans think they’ve broken down the ‘hidden meanings’ behind Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime performance in New Orleans on Sunday (February 9).

While the main action was on the field of play as the Philadelphia Eagles beat the Kansas City Chiefs, denying Travis Kelce and his teammates a third consecutive Super Bowl crown, the halftime show is of course a big part of proceedings.

This year, it was rapper Lamar headlining the halftime show – and like any good Super Bowl performance, it was full of talking points.

And many fans have taken to social media to discuss the ‘hidden meanings’ behind the performance.

Serena Williams was a surprise guest during the halftime show (Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Roc Nation)

Serena Williams was a surprise guest during the halftime show (Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Roc Nation)

Why Serena Williams was at the Super Bowl

Serena Williams shocked fans after appearing during Lamar’s halftime show, but why was she there?

Well, one fan took to Twitter and explained: “For those of y’all who weren’t outside, the media tore Serena to shreds for crip walking at Wimbledon.

“Her coming back to do a dance that references a culture she’s actually a part of, during a live performance criticizing someone for being a culture vulture is *chef’s kiss.*”

Her involvement seemingly adds insult to injury as Drake was rumored to date Williams at one point, with the rappers currently locked in a public fued.

Drake dig

Drake’s legal team has filed a defamation lawsuit against his own record label Universal Music Group for releasing the track ‘Not Like Us’.

While Lamar is not specifically named in the suit, it alleges that the claims in the song were baseless and harmful to his career.

Universal said: “Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist – let alone Drake – is illogical.”

Fans on social media believe Lamar made a reference to the ongoing in beef during his halftime Super Bowl performance.

“Rewatched the performance and just realized Kendrick’s necklace……is in the shape of the chord a minor 😟 this man is a f****** genius, I can’t,” one fan penned.

Drake and Kendrick Lamar have been locked in a bitter feud (Cole Burston/Getty Images)

Drake and Kendrick Lamar have been locked in a bitter feud (Cole Burston/Getty Images)

Why Samuel L. Jackson was ‘Uncle Sam’

Lamar’s action-packed halftime performance began with acting legend Samuel L. Jackson, who was dressed as Uncle Sam.

“Salutations, it’s your uncle… Sam,” the actor said.

“And this is the great American game.”

One fan took to Twitter to explain a theory behind the move.

Samuel L. Jackson during the halftime show (Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

Samuel L. Jackson during the halftime show (Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

They said: “Uncle Sam dates back to the War of 1812, when slavery was still rampant & continued being a symbol of “Patriotism” (Trump calls Americans ‘patriots’ which many feel is code) that people felt perpetuated the marginalization of Black People. Tonight, Uncle Sam was Black.

“America as it was portrayed on that stage was Black, during a time where diversity is actively being legally stripped away in many forms in this country. Kendrick Lamar sent a strong message right in front of the President that we built this country, no matter what you & yours may think.”

Fans break down the ‘hidden meanings’ behind Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime performance Read More
#44: How to wear a Canadian Tuxedo without looking like Britney and Justin

#44: How to wear a Canadian Tuxedo without looking like Britney and Justin

#44: How to wear a Canadian Tuxedo without looking like Britney and Justin

Double the pleasure, double the fun. Double the denim!

Today’s topic is a fun one. We’re doubling down on double denim aka the Canadian Tuxedo (more on that below) aka denim-on-denim (what we call it in the biz).

Full credit goes to my work wife and long-time friend, who suggested this idea after Kendrick Lamar and I both rocked double denim this week. (His look looked especially good with multiple Grammy awards!)

I fell asleep and missed the Grammys, so this was an unintentional twinning! (Kenrick by Kevin Winter//Getty Images; Me by Me//My iPhone)

It’s no secret that I am a huge fan of denim. I’ve written about it here and here and here (it could easily be the workhorse of my wardrobe).

But as an elder millennial who brain was burned by this image…

Britney and Justin at the 2001 VMAs (P.S. We’re obviously Team Britney here.)

It’s taken me a little while to figure out how to wear denim with denim that doesn’t get me in double trouble.

(Which, ironically, was why the Canadian Tuxedo was invented in the first place. Because Bing Crosby got in dress code trouble for wearing Levi’s jeans at a fancy Vancouver hotel. When Levi’s heard about this, they created a formal tuxedo jacket made from their denim just for him.1)

Bing Crosby in his natural element & rocking his denim tuxedo c/o Levi’s

But thanks to some excellent inspiration that I’ve gathered and studied over the years, I think I’ve cracked the code on how to wear it.

My Denim-on-Denim Hall of Fame

My Do’s and Don’ts for Denim-on-Denim:

  1. DO wear similar shades (washes) on top and bottom
  2. DON’T lean too hard into the Western vibes
  3. DO layer, t-shirts under, blazers over, etc.
  4. DON’T wear a cowboy hat 😉
  5. DO accent with rich reds, burgundys and neutrals like camel, tobacco, and chocolate browns
  6. DON’T mix with brights or neons (right now at least, too Jenna Lyons J.Crew for the moment, but I could see it coming back and I’d be first in line!)
  7. DO pair with prints, like cheetah, zebra, even snakeskin in small doses (like my boots above)
  8. DON’T pair with polka dots, or other overly bold, graphic prints. Small scale is better.
  9. DO accessorize with polished jewelry, pointy-toed shoes, and preppy elements like loafers
  10. DON’T go overly dressy, avoid stilettos and Britney-style Swarovski!!
Rich red accents

The beauty of double denim is how it casually makes a statement. It’s classic Americana without feeling classic. Cowboy swagger without having to learn how to ride a horse. Laid-back but a step ahead of jeans and a tee shirt. Minimal with a maximalist impact. Midimalist, if you will.

 

Love a denim shirt open over a tee (and under a beautiful coat or blazer). Nick Parker elevated.

Is this a Yay or Nay for you? Tell me in the comments!

LOOK BOOK

Denim-on-Denim for Day
Plaid Cotton Coat / Straight Leg Denim / Denim Shirt / Leather Turnlock Bag (bonus, it is lined in chambray!) / Pointy Toe Suede Boots
Denim-on-Denim for Play
We obviously need a sweater vest / Wide Leg Jean / Puff Sleeve Denim Top / Oxblood Leather Bag / Oxblood Ballet Flat
Denim-on-Denim for Work
Herringbone Linen-Blend Blazer (perfect for now and later) / Straight Leg Jean / The Bow Blouse / The Work Tote / The Work Pump
Denim-on-Denim for After Dark
Our twist on Bing Crosby’s Canadian Tuxdeo… Denim Blazer / Matching Denim Trouser / Ruffle Tuxedo Denim Shirt / Black Leather Belt / The Bangle That Can Do No Wrong / A Perfect LBH (little black heel)
#44: How to wear a Canadian Tuxedo without looking like Britney and Justin Read More
Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar led one of the best Grammys in years. Has the awards show transformed

Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar led one of the best Grammys in years. Has the awards show transformed?

Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar led one of the best Grammys in years. Has the awards show transformed?

Beyonce, second right, accepts the award for album of the year for “Cowboy Carter during the 67th annual Grammy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 2, 2025, in Los Angeles. Blue Ivy Carter looks on from right. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)

LOS Angeles The Grammy Awards have long been criticized over a lack of diversity, with a history of artists of color, women, and rap and R&B musicians being snubbed for top prizes. Sunday’s edition suggests something may have shifted.

Beyoncé, the most awarded and nominated artist in Grammys history, finally won album of the year for her country-and-then-some album, “Cowboy Carter,” furthering her dedication to recentering Black art in popular culture. Kendrick Lamar took home two of the top four prizes of the night, celebrating hip-hop on a show that has historically neglected the genre. The Grammys placed young pop performers in the spotlight at the moment of their ascent, meeting the contemporary music moment.

The Recording Academy has made concerted efforts to diversify in recent years. Could it be those strides have already paid off in a course correction? Or were the 2025 Grammys simply a one-off?

A feud squashed

Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. appeared onstage to address “some real criticism” facing the organisation behind the Grammys.

“Artists were pretty vocal with their complaints,” he said, reaching back to 2020: “The Weeknd called out the academy for lack of transparency in our awards. He went so far as to announce he was boycotting the Grammys.”

Five years can make a world of difference. At the end of his speech, Mason introduced The Weeknd as a surprise performer, making his first appearance at the Grammys since 2017.

His return suggested approval of a new voting class—several presenters took care to note that the awards were decided by more than 13,000 voting members.

Peter A. Berry, a music journalist with work in XXL and Complex, believes that reading might be too pat, though. “He performed to promote his new album,” he said, referencing The Weeknd’s “Hurry Up Tomorrow.” That timing aligned with the Grammys’ need to highlight its reform.

“I can’t remove my cynical music industry lens,” he says. “Time heals all wounds when you need it.”

Kendrick Lamar, left, accepts the record of the year award for “Not Like Us during the 67th annual Grammy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 2, 2025, in Los Angeles. Mustard looks on from right. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)

A more diverse voting body

Of the Recording Academy’s current voting membership, 66% are men, 49% are white, and 66% are over the age of 40. But the academy announced last year that 3,000 female voting members had been added since 2019. Two-thirds of the total voting body joined in the last five years. In that same time, the academy has increased the number of members who identify as people of colour by 63%, with 100% growth in Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 90% growth in Black voters, and 43% growth in Latino voters.

At the 2024 Grammys, women dominated the major categories, and as a result, every televised competitive Grammy went to at least one woman. It appeared to reflect contemporary interest in female pop performers—Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Victoria Monét, and Karol G, among them. In 2025, that trend continued. Women received every single televised award on Sunday night with the exception of Lamar’s and one shared between Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars.

“They got it right this year,” Berry says. “Maybe it is that the voting committee changed.”

Nominees and winners reflect contemporary interest

The nominations announced in November acknowledged the artists who led the conversation in 2024. Beyoncé was celebrated with 11 nominations, which Kinitra D. Brooks—an academic and author of “The Lemonade Reader”—says was the result of voters finally recognising “this is clearly someone who deserves the respect of her peers.”

Chappell Roan and Sabrina Carpenter, experiencing breakout years, received six nods each. The ubiquitous, discourse-dominating “Not Like Us” from Lamar and Charli Xcx’s “BRAT” also received recognition.

And that translated to awards. There were a number of first-time award winners, many women and people of colour like Doechii, Carin León, and Sierra Ferrell. In the relatively new songwriter of the year, non-classical category, Amy Allen became the first woman to take home the trophy.

A move in the right direction for hip-hop

“Not Like Us” was an early winner at the Grammys’ premiere ceremony, receiving trophies for music video, rap song, and rap performance. It marked his seventh time winning in that last category. But it was his presence during the main broadcast that really made a splash. One of the biggest global hits of 2024, his Drake Diss track won song and record of the year—only the second hip-hop single to ever win record of the year. By the end of the night, “Not Like Us” had won all five awards for which it was nominated.

Lamar’s recognitions arrived the year after Jay-Z criticised the Grammys for ignoring the rap legends before him—those who brought hip-hop to the preeminent music award show, only to have rap categories not make the official broadcast.

“We want you all to get it right,” Jay-Z said last year. “At least get it close to right.”

Berry describes Lamar’s wins as “a layup,” a celebration of one of the great rap records of recent history.

And though Lamar’s wins meant more hip-hop on the broadcast, Berry says the Grammys’ hip-hop picks tend to be predictable. He says there’s a “cookie cutter” formula for the kind of rappers the Recording Academy recognises.

“The more esoteric and abstract rap,” as well as “the mid-level street rap,” goes largely ignored, he says.

Course-correcting the biggest blind spot

Beyoncé’s album of the year victory was widely thought to be long overdue. The superstar had four of her albums nominated in the category before winning on her fifth.

She seemingly alluded to it in her acceptance speech: “It’s been many, many years,” she said.

“I Am… Sasha Fierce” lost to Taylor Swift for “Fearless” in 2010. In 2015, her self-titled album “Beyoncé” lost to Beck’s “Morning Phase” and Harry Styles’ “Harry’s House” beat “Renaissance” in 2023. Perhaps most infamously, though, was the loss of “Lemonade” to Adele’s “25.”

“I can’t possibly accept this award. And I’m very humbled, and I’m very grateful and gracious, but my artist of my life is Beyoncé,” Adele said in her 2017 acceptance speech, holding back tears.

In winning album of the year Sunday, Beyoncé became the first Black woman to win the top prize in the 21st century. The last was Lauryn Hill with “The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill,” 26 years ago. Before her were Natalie Cole and Whitney Houston, and the list ends there.
Brooks believes “Beyoncé reflects that Black women can be excellent and still ignored in very particular ways—because this is a top honour in her field.”

Emily Lordi, a Vanderbilt University professor whose focus is African American literature and Black popular music, describes “Cowboy Carter” as “an album with a capital A—one that explicitly aims to restore the Black roots and routes of country, a genre long coded as white. It is the kind of historic intervention the academy could not fail to recognise—it was undeniable.”

Berry points to the fact that the record’s country influence may have aligned with the academy’s traditionalist voters—but also appealed to those inspired by its break with convention.

“It is some cosmic justice being done,” says Berry. “It might not be the best Bey album, but it was the best of the category.”

Even Grammys’ host Trevor Noah couldn’t help but acknowledge the milestone: “We finally saw it happen, everyone,” he said. That, we did.

Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar led one of the best Grammys in years. Has the awards show transformed? Read More