Review: Taylor Swift ends record-breaking Eras Tour with electric Vancouver show

Review: Taylor Swift ends record-breaking Eras Tour with electric Vancouver show

‘Vancouver, I want to thank every single one of you for being part of the most thrilling chapter of my entire life to date,’ Swift told the crowd

Article content

After nearly 150 concerts spanning five continents and more than 10 million fans attending, Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour came to a close in Vancouver Sunday night at B.C. Place.

Opening her three-night stint with a spectacular opening show on Friday, Swift staged a concert that will surely live on in fans’ minds — and relived through countless highlight reels and social media posts — for a very long time.

“Can you believe this is the last night of the Eras Tour? I can’t,” opening act Gracie Abrams said to the crowd, adding: “Have all of you been crying all day like me?”

The singer joined Swift on 49 of the Eras Tour dates, including Toronto and Vancouver, and clearly wasn’t quite ready to say goodbye.

It’s a sentiment that was most certainly shared by fans.

Swift selected Vancouver to close out her record-breaking tour — the Eras Tour went down as the first tour to gross $1 billion way back in December 2023 and final ticket sales after the three B.C. Place dates total more than $2 billion, according to The New York Times  — because of the dedicated fan response she receives here.

“We spent the entire year of 2024 travelling the world,” the superstar singer-songwriter said in concert on Friday. “And we thought to ourselves: ‘Where have the crowds been so generous, so welcoming, so warm-hearted — where they know every single word, they not only sing them, but they scream them? Oh, we’ve got to go back to Canada.’ And so now here we are in beautiful Vancouver.”

And those fans certainly must have met — if not exceeded — Swift’s expectations on Sunday night.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

What was the set list?

Rumours abounded before the final night that the already-lengthy set list would go even longer.

The rumours, it turns out, were false. In true Eras fashion, the show started punctually and ran with a familiar set list, save for the “surprise songs,” which featured five song mash-ups instead of four.

Lover

1. Miss Americana & the Heartbreak Prince
2. Cruel Summer
3. The Man
4. You Need to Calm Down
5. Lover

Fearless 

1. Fearless
2. You Belong With Me
3. Love Story

Red

1. 22
2. We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together
3. I Knew You Were Trouble
4. All Too Well

Speak Now

2. Enchanted

Reputation

1. … Ready For It?
2. Delicate
3. Don’t Blame Me
4. Look What You Made Me Do

Folklore/Evermore

1. Cardigan
2. Betty
3. Champagne Problems
4. August
5. Illicit affairs
6. My Tears Ricochet
7. Margorie
8. Willow

1989

1. Style
2. Blank Space
3. Shake It Off
4. Wildest Dreams
5. Bad Blood

The Tortured Poets Department

1. But Daddy I Love Him/ So High School
2. Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me?
3. Down Bad
4. Fortnight
5. The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived
6. I Can Do It With a Broken Heart

Review: Taylor Swift ends record-breaking Eras Tour with electric Vancouver show Read More
Person of interest caught in connection to the killing of United Healthcare CEO

Person of interest caught in connection to the killing of United Healthcare CEO

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot dead on December 4

Police are questioning a person in connection with the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

On Wednesday (December 4) at 6:46am, Thompson was shot outside of the Hilton Hotel in Manhattan, New York.

Footage was released by authorities of the CEO’s alleged killer and sources have since revealed to NBC News that a person has been brought in for questioning in Altoona, Pennsylvania.

Footage released by police showed the moment a person armed with a gun approached Thompson from behind and began shooting.

Thompson could be seen falling to the floor, the shooter fleeing the scene by electric bike.

On Wednesday, New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch told reporters authorities believe the attack was ‘premeditated, preplanned’ and ‘targeted,’ the shooter appearing ‘to wait for his intended target’.

Paulette Thompson told NBC News that her husband had been receiving ‘some threats’ and the words ‘deny,’ ‘defend’ – or police stating ‘delay’ – and ‘depose’ were later discovered written on the shell casings.

NYPD chief of detectives Kenny said: “Based on the evidence we have so far, it does appear the victim was specifically targeted. But at this point, we do not know why.”

After sharing footage, police also released further photographs of the attacker asking for the public’s help and offering a reward of $10,000 for information ‘leading to an arrest and conviction’.

And sources have revealed a man has since been brought in for questioning.

Brian Thompson was shot on December 4 (UnitedHealth Group)

Brian Thompson was shot on December 4 (UnitedHealth Group)

The person in question was picked up by authorities at a McDonald’s in Altoona after he was spotted acting ‘suspiciously’.

The person who has been brought in for questioning is reported as having allegedly been found with a gun similar to that used in the killing of Thompson alongside a silencer, sources said.

Thompson’s suspected shooter is also believed to have arrived in New York in late November and stayed in a hostel in Manhattan under the name ‘Marc Rosario,’ police said.

Two senior law enforcement officials told NBC News that the man who has since been brought in for questioning was also found carrying a fake Nevada Jersey ID with the name ‘Marc Rosario’.

The person of interest has not been arrested or charged.

A senior law enforcement official says authorities are now looking at the person of interest’s recent movements.

Police place bullet casing markers outside of a Hilton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan where United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Police place bullet casing markers outside of a Hilton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan where United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Thompson’s family released a statement reading: “Brian was an incredibly loving, generous, talented man who truly lived life to the fullest and touched so many lives.”

Person of interest caught in connection to the killing of United Healthcare CEO Read More
Google unveils 'mind-boggling' quantum computing chip

Google unveils ‘mind-boggling’ quantum computing chip

Google The willow chip, a flat pearlescent square with a thick black edge and a black square at its centre, rests in the gloved palm of the hand of an engineerGoogle

The new Willow chip

Google has unveiled a new chip which it claims takes five minutes to solve a problem that would currently take the world’s fastest super computers ten septillion – or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years – to complete.

The chip is the latest development in a field known as quantum computing – which is attempting to use the principles of particle physics to create a new type of mind-bogglingly powerful computer.

Google says its new quantum chip, dubbed “Willow”, incorporates key “breakthroughs” and “paves the way to a useful, large-scale quantum computer.”

However experts say Willow is, for now, a largely experimental device, meaning a quantum computer powerful enough to solve a wide range of real-world problems is still years – and billions of dollars – away.

The quantum quandary

Quantum computers work in a fundamentally different way to the computer in your phone or laptop.

They harness quantum mechanics – the strange behaviour of ultra-tiny particles – to crack problems far faster than traditional computers.

It’s hoped quantum computers might eventually be able to use that ability to vastly speed up complex processes, such as creating new medicines.

There are also fears it could be used for ill – for example to break some types of encryption used to protect sensitive data.

In February Apple announced that the encryption that protects iMessage chats is being made “quantum proof” to stop them being read by powerful future quantum computers.

Hartmut Neven leads Google’s Quantum AI lab that created Willow and describes himself as the project’s “chief optimist.”

He told the BBC that Willow would be used in some practical applications – but declined, for now, to provide more detail.

But a chip able to perform commercial applications would not appear before the end of the decade, he said.

Initially these applications would be the simulation of systems where quantum effects are important

“For example, relevant when it comes to the design of nuclear fusion reactors to understand the functioning of drugs and pharmaceutical development, it would be relevant for developing better car batteries and another long list of such tasks”.

What is quantum computing?

Apples and oranges

Mr Neven told the BBC Willow’s performance meant it was the “best quantum processor built to date”.

But Professor Alan Woodward, a computing expert at Surrey University, says quantum computers will be better at a range of tasks than current “classical” computers, but they will not replace them.

He warns against overstating the importance of Willow’s achievement in a single test.

“One has to be careful not to compare apples and oranges” he told the BBC.

Google had chosen a problem to use as a benchmark of performance that was, “tailor-made for a quantum computer” and this didn’t demonstrate “a universal speeding up when compared to classical computers”.

Nonetheless, he said Willow represented significant progress, in particular in what’s known as error correction.

In very simple terms the more useful a quantum computer is, the more qubits it has.

However a major problem with the technology is that it is prone to errors – a tendency that has previously increased the more qubits a chip has.

But Google researchers say they have reversed this and managed to engineer and program the new chip so the error rate fell across the whole system as the number of qubits increased.

It was a major “breakthrough” that cracked a key challenge that the field had pursued “for almost 30 years”, Mr Neven believes.

He told the BBC it was comparable to “if you had an airplane with just one engine – that will work, but two engines are safer, four engines is yet safer”.

Errors are a significant obstacle in creating more powerful quantum computers and the development was “encouraging for everyone striving to build a practical quantum computer” Prof Woodward said.

But Google itself notes that to develop practically useful quantum computers the error rate will still need to go much lower than that displayed by Willow.

Google Google staff, a woman to the left and a man to the right work on the cryostat which holds the chip and keeps it very cold. The cryostat losley resembles  a chandelier  made of cascading thin metal tubes.Google
Google staff work on the cryostat that holds the chip and keeps it very cold

Willow was made in Google’s new, purpose-built manufacturing plant in California.

Countries around the world are investing in quantum computing.

The UK recently launched the National Quantum Computing Centre (NQCC).

Its director, Michael Cuthbert, told the BBC he was wary of language that fuelled the “hype cycle” and thought Willow was more a “milestone rather than a breakthrough”.

Nevertheless, it was “clearly a highly impressive piece of work”.

Eventually quantum computers would help with a range of tasks including “logistics problems such as cargo freight distribution on aircraft or routing of telecoms signals or stored energy throughout the national grid”, he said.

And there were already 50 quantum businesses in the UK, attracting £800m in funding and employing 1300 people.

On Friday, researchers from Oxford University and Osaka University in Japan published a paper showcasing the very low error rate in a trapped-ion qubit.

Theirs is a different approach to making a quantum computer that’s capable of working at room temperature – whereas Google’s chip has to be stored at ultra low temperatures to be effective.

Google unveils ‘mind-boggling’ quantum computing chip Read More
Woman reveals shocking amount it costs to have a baby as she receives ‘disgusting’ medical bill

Woman reveals shocking amount it costs to have a baby as she receives ‘disgusting’ medical bill

Woman reveals shocking amount it costs to have a baby as she receives ‘disgusting’ medical bill

The mom-of-two left viewers stunned with a video about the costs

It’s no secret that healthcare in the US is expensive, but every now and again a story like this comes along to remind us of just how astronomical the costs can be – especially if you don’t have insurance.

Mom-of-two and Silicon Valley entrepreneur Marina Mogilko took to Instagram to share her experience earlier this year, after she welcomed her second child into the world.

Marina Mogilko described her delivery as 'smooth' (Instagram/@linguamarina)

Marina Mogilko described her delivery as ‘smooth’ (Instagram/@linguamarina)

Having given birth before, Marina was familiar with the process and waited a couple of hours after she went into labor before she actually left to go to the hospital.

Once she arrived, she and her husband learned that she was already well on her way to giving birth so she was taken straight to the delivery room where she had a ‘super fast’ delivery, giving birth just 20 minutes after she entered the room.

Doctors had to stitch up Marina afterwards, but otherwise, it was a ‘smooth’ delivery and the family was then moved to a room with a private bathroom, unlimited food, and a bed where Marina’s husband could stay for the night.

Marina stayed in a private room with her husband (Instagram/@linguamarina)

Marina stayed in a private room with her husband (Instagram/@linguamarina)

With another young child already at home, Marina and her husband decided to leave the hospital the following day, meaning they only spent one night there.

The family then got to enjoy two weeks as a new family of four, before they were hit with the medical bill for their time at the hospital.

Now, news of Marina’s private room with unlimited food might lead you to expect a slightly higher bill, but probably not quite as high as the one the mom actually received.

According to her Instagram video, in total the parents were billed $36,455.16 for their one-night stay. To put that in perspective, that’s more than a year’s salary for a lot of people.

Insurance thankfully covered much of the bill (Instagram/@linguamarina)

Insurance thankfully covered much of the bill (Instagram/@linguamarina)

Thankfully Marina was covered by insurance which paid for the majority of the bill, but she and her husband still had to pay $2,201.29 for giving birth at the hospital.

Viewers have been left horrified by the figure, with one person writing: “That’s actually a disgusting bill. I’m so sorry that you have to put up with that.”

Another added: “Theft in broad daylight.”

A number of international readers also expressed their relief that they don’t have to worry about such costs thanks to free or cheaper healthcare in their countries, while other people suggested Marina would have been better having ‘stayed home and had a home birth’.

Woman reveals shocking amount it costs to have a baby as she receives ‘disgusting’ medical bill Read More
Tesla and the Coming Service Economy: The Robot that Brings Other Robots

Tesla and the Coming Service Economy: The Robot that Brings Other Robots

Someday in the next decade a car will pull up in front of your home, a humanoid robot will hop out, open the trunk, pull out a stack of pizzas, and walk to the front door.

The robot (an autonomous vehicle) brought a robot (a humanoid) which brings everything as a service (it can bring specialized robots with it).

Need your garden weeded? Your windows or solar system cleaned? Your floor vacuumed? Your groceries ordered? Your laundry folded? Your home secured? All that, and more, will be offered to you as a service.

It’s why Figure AI’s founder, that just landed $675 million to build its humanoid robot, says the total addressable market is “the largest on the planet.”

Long before it shows up on your doorstep, though, the humanoid robots will take over many tasks inside factories, offices, stores, and other businesses. Why there first? Well, workers will put up with a weird movement or two and the business will see a business need to fork over the $100k or more to buy the first ones. Most consumers can’t afford more than $200 a month for a robot. Not to mention payments for a $100,000 robot! So consumers will need to wait until manufacturing scales up to a point where the price can be reduced to less than $25,000 per robot.

Figure’s Figure 01 robot

Even in the factory it will bring a new kind of service. Say they are being used in an auto repair shop, we could see a “SnapOn Service.” Your humanoid robot could bring you any tool you need from SnapOn. The most common ones kept in a tool chest in the shop, like they are today, but less common ones, a robot ride away.

If a rare car comes in for, say, a new transmission, your robot could prepare the shop for the new job by driving to a distribution center and picking up some rarer tools. Most jobs are like this, if you know a radical change is coming you can prepare for it ahead of time like if a music festival is coming with 150,000 attendees like Coachella does. There Uber prepared for the festival by building a parking lot ahead of time to deal with the 3,000 vehicles it moved to the Palm Springs area to serve the festival goers. A rare vehicle coming into your repair shop is the same kind of change: an unexpected, and rare, event.

Now that Apple has killed its autonomous vehicle project, we are taking a fresh look at the robotics industry and we see that Tesla is uniquely positioned to succeed here. Why?

Tesla

Consumers trust and love Tesla. Its customers are fanatical about the company. It makes batteries, electric motors, and AI computer hardware and AI software itself. At scale! Few other companies can match it in manufacturing expertise. No one else in the humanoid robot business can make vehicle-sized things at scale (in the millions) the way Tesla can. Nor do they have the financial ability to support a sizable R&D effort for years. That’s an exclusive club with members like Apple, Google, Meta and Nvidia. If you have $100 Billion in your pocket, you can play! But none other than Tesla has the distribution advantages of an existing car fleet.  And they definitely don’t have the data advantage that fleet brings. And only Tesla and Apple have the brands it would take to bring a robot into peoples’ homes worldwide.

Apple

Apple is one of those few and would have been the only other company that could compete, but they found out the hard way consumer electronics isn’t the same as heavy manufacturing.

Apple, while they kill it when it comes to personal computing and phones, has fallen behind when it comes to its crown jewel: Siri. Most folks wouldn’t consider Siri to be Apple’s crown jewel. Most would say the iPhone. We say different. Siri is what links all Apple’s products together. But it’s been neglected!  Siri was cutting edge once. It isn’t now. And Apple hasn’t made any major stride in consumer AI for 5-10 years. No one looks to them for what is to come in AI. That will change at WWDC come June. A new multi-modal and multi-model Siri arrives in June. Apple may get some ground back from ChatGPT, but it’s not enough to match Musk in the race to build the best AI robotics.

Grok 

When we host or join X’s audio spaces we hear this over and over again: that consumers would welcome a Tesla robot into their homes, while they don’t feel that warmly to other potential companies. Which brings up another reason to believe in Tesla’s robot: Elon’s other companies. X, for example (formerly known as Twitter) is about to turn on a sizeable update to its AI, Grok.

If we did have a humanoid robot, it will be Grok that you talk to, even if it’s called something else. Plus, once in your home, the robot will need to continue the conversation with you, which includes topics consumers care about like news, sports, entertainment.

But it is the voice data that Elon Musk has from X Spaces that will take X’s Grok to be competitive with OpenAI’s Whisper API, which does voice to text and back again. Whisper will be hard to beat. We tested it in many noisy places including a loud dance floor at a wedding, and it’s the best at understanding humans that we’ve seen so far.

The winner in AI is usually the one with the most data. Tesla, along with X, has the most data of human audio conversations. It will lead to a robot that will understand humans better than others, which means acceptance in more homes.

It is Tesla’s coming Robotaxi network that we see as a huge advantage over others. Why? Because, as we laid out in our book, “The Infinite Retina,” having a humanless-vehicle network will dramatically lower the price to move these robots around town, which means a few customers might be able to share a humanoid robot since the price will be high at first.

But we see the Robotaxi network itself as the way that Optimus, Tesla’s humanoid, will be introduced to the world. One day you will be picked up by a Tesla to take you to the airport. In the driver’s seat is an Optimus, which can get out, help you with your bags, or your wheelchair/strollers, and then help the car drive you to the airport.

Tesla’s Optimus

Help drive?

Yes, Optimus will have eyes that are better than most of the cameras in its fleet as of early 2024, and can provide redundancy, which will greatly increase safety. It can also look into spots where the existing cameras have a tough time seeing, like around a blind turn.

Tesla is training its robot to drive, we learned from a Tesla employee, which makes sense, right, since it’s based on the same digital twin the car is driving on.

Many customers will try a Tesla the first time this way, getting a ride at an airport, or home from a bar, like they do with Uber/Lyft today. But the robot will behave like a human, can high five you, and talk with you.

These customers who meet Optimus will see how competent it is at helping them with luggage, or driving a car. It will increase their love of, and trust of, the Tesla brand. To the point they will look into getting one for their home, or be much more accepting of it bringing a stack of pizzas to your front door.

Most people today can’t see inviting such a contraption into their homes. Worries about privacy, safety, security frequently are mentioned by consumers we talk to in doing our research. But Tesla owners already say they would invite Optimus into their homes. That’s a way to introduce millions of people to a humanoid robot.

This ability to “distribute” the humanoid robot to businesses and then homes, and having the trust to be accepted inside, even bragged about to others, is a large moat we don’t see others getting across.

See, once the humanoid robot gets accepted inside the home, maybe to set the table at first for your pizza party, but later to do things like dishes, clothes, general repairs and upkeep, security, and entertainment, the first robot inside the home brings other of these specialized robots.

Housekeeper robot of the future

Already there are specialized robots that vacuum, clean windows, blow snow, pick weeds, and more but these come with new troubles for humans. The window washing robots, for instance, need to be manually moved from one window to the next. Many homes have dozens of pieces of glass, so that’s quite a chore. One that a humanoid robot would be happy to do for a fee.

Window washing as a service just arrived in that home.

Because the humanoid is a generalized robot it should be able to turn literally everything else in the home into a service:

Groceries as a service.
Laundry as a service.
Meals as a service. (And a lot cheaper and more consistent than the ones where a human delivers).
Gardening as a service.
Security as a service.

It gets better for Tesla. As it is asked to perform laundry as a service it will quickly know what your favorite brand of detergent is for washing your clothes. What if the bottle of Tide is empty? Well, you asked the robot to wash your clothes and fold them for, say, $100 a month. That means the robot gets to replace your Tide with a brand it prefers. Or, gets to bulk buy Tide which changes the economics for Procter and Gamble. And not in a good way.

The competitors:

  1. Amazon, which bought Zoox, and has millions of robots inside its warehouses already.
  2. Figure, which just raised $675 million for its humanoid.
  3. Waymo/Google. Now expanding into more of California’s population centers.

We consider competitors as:

  1. Have enough cash flow to have a sustained R&D effort to complete not just a humanoid robot, but the infrastructure to enable a robot to be directed into people’s homes and keep track of tasks/services provided.
  2. Have a fleet of vehicles or a plausible ability to get such within three years (millions of vehicles).
  3. Have consumer-ready brand/trust to be welcomed into the home.

To get a better understanding of the everything-as-a-service market, we visited Electric Sheep, a Silicon Valley-based company that is making a variety of robots to do landscaping work. It bought a landscaping company to get the customers and employees to train the robots. Unlike other grass-cutting robots, theirs are generalizable. That means they don’t need a wire around the lawn to show the robot where it can and can’t go: it learns that by “seeing” the lawn, just like a human.

Humans are still needed to get the robot off the truck and to do other tasks that their robots can’t yet do (which are, for now, mostly focused on cutting grass, even though there are many other things that their landscaping company does).

Electric Sheep already is doing “lawn mowing as a service” and is prepared for when humanoids get good enough to do the other jobs. Founder, Naganand Murty told us that he sees a humanoid robot that’s good enough for his tasks to be a decade away. He decided to make a two-wheeled robot that can push around specialized tools, which they introduced last week, named “Verdie.” He says the AI job of training such a robot is a lot easier than building a humanoid and can do lawn care tasks better than a humanoid will be able to do for years.

Others, like Eric Jang, founder of 1X Technologies, another humanoid robot manufacturer, said on a post on X that all AI roads lead to robotics. and that the industry could get there a lot faster than that.

It is the ability to bring other robots to your businesses or homes (like Electric Sheep’s Verdie) that unlocks the huge total addressable market and brings us all into everything as a service that has both us, as well as many investors, excited.

Just Three Things

According to Scoble and Cronin, the top three relevant happenings last week

Humanoid robotics startup Figure receives $675M in Series B funding, valued at $2.6B

Figure received funding from Microsoft, OpenAI Startup Fund, NVIDIA, Bezos Expeditions, Parkway Venture Capital, Intel Capital, Align Ventures, and ARK Invest. Its humanoid robot, called Figure 01, has already been employed by BMW for an automotive manufacturing facility and is designed to mitigate workforce shortages and manage tasks that are too dangerous for human workers. Figure is facing competition from Tesla with their Optimus robot and Boston Dynamics. Ars Technica

Smart glasses from Apple? A possibility

According to an article from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple is mulling whether or not to offer smart glasses like those from Meta and Amazon. It’s also considering designing a fitness ring and AirPods with cameras. We think that Apple producing smart glasses will serve as a bridge to their Apple glasses that may be offered around 2028. Bloomberg

Google announces Genie which can transform a single image into a virtual game

Google has developed something extraordinary with Genie. It’s in research preview mode and illustrates playable worlds could be generated from a single image, sketch or text prompt. Although it’s wonderful, it’s still quite crude looking. It’ll take more time to develop into a more elegant and easily orchestrated tool. Tom’s Guide.

Tesla and the Coming Service Economy: The Robot that Brings Other Robots Read More
'Home Alone 3 trailer' reveals what happens when the Wet Bandits are released from prison in 2024

‘Home Alone 3 trailer’ reveals what happens when the Wet Bandits are released from prison in 2024

'Home Alone 3 trailer' reveals what happens when the Wet Bandits are released from prison in 2024

While Home Alone 3 exists, a fan has created a parody trailer for ‘Kevin’s Revenge’

A ‘Home Alone 3 trailer’ imagines what would happen if the infamous Wet Bandits were released from prison in 2024.

The original Home Alone, which fans are still continuing to spot new nooks and crannies within to this very day, released 34 years ago.

Yep, you read that right. We first met the McCallisters some 34 years ago, making us all feel very old indeed.

Home Alone has certainly withstood the test of time and is regarded by many as one of the best festive flicks out there, with some households even watching the film multiple times in the build-up to the big day.

Home Alone continues to be one of the most loved festive films of all time (20th Century Studios)
Home Alone continues to be one of the most loved festive films of all time (20th Century Studios)

The first 1990 movie sees troubled kid Kevin (Macaulay Culkin) get accidentally abandoned by his family as they head off for a Christmas vacation.

Left home alone over the festive period, Kevin has to fend for himself, with the scenes all fans love involving Kevin reeking havoc on Harry (Joe Pesci) and Marv (Daniel Stern), aka the Wet Bandits, through a series of stunts that leaves the criminals sustaining multiple serious injuries.

Home Alone 2 followed a few years later, which included a lot of similar antics, but this time in New York.

While there is an official third movie in the Home Alone series, a parody ‘Home Alone 3′ trailer is doing the rounds on social media.

Dubbed ‘Kevin’s Revenge’, the third movie imagines what it would be like if the Wet Bandits were released from prison today and went for the kid, who’s now a fully grown adult, who put them through hell all them years ago.

While Kevin would be in his 40s, we have no doubt this film would have been utter chaos and a whole tonne of fun. Though, there was a Home Alone 3 (and even a Home Alone 4 for that matter), but they really weren’t well received.

The third instalment follows eight-year-old Alex Pruitt as he defends his home from a dangerous group of criminals.

Alex is given a remote-control car for helping his neighbor, Mrs Hess, shovel snow from her driveway.

The 'Home Alone 3' trailer has gone viral (YouTube/VJ4rawr2)

The ‘Home Alone 3’ trailer has gone viral (YouTube/VJ4rawr2)

But little does he know the seemingly harmless toy car contains a top-secret computer chip – which the thieves are trying their hardest to acquire.

Alex then has to fend off the criminals as they intend to use the chip to help a terrorist organization.

The real life Home Alone 3 was received incredibly poorly by fans and critics alike, which might have been because Macaulay Culkin and the Wet Bandits were nowhere to be seen.

Oh, Kevin.

‘Home Alone 3 trailer’ reveals what happens when the Wet Bandits are released from prison in 2024 Read More
World's oldest people all eat this one 'superfood' for breakfast and it's actually quite common

World’s oldest people all eat this one ‘superfood’ for breakfast and it’s actually quite common

World's oldest people all eat this one 'superfood' for breakfast and it's actually quite common

If you want to live a long healthy life, then there’s one thing you should incorporate into your diet – and it can actually be quite tasty

If you wish to live a long healthy life, you need to incorporate one breakfast item into your daily routine.

Given you avoid an early death on the road, catching a deadly disease or falling foul some other way, if you do manage to live your life till your heart finally signs out, then you should listen to what all the oldest people in the world eat for breakfast.

If you want to live to 100 then you should include one important breakfast meal to your diet (Getty stock)

If you want to live to 100 then you should include one important breakfast meal to your diet (Getty stock)

This ‘superfood’ is actually quite common, and if a UK survey of 2022 is anything to go by, more than a third of young adults aged 18 to 24 already eat this food for breakfast.

Before we get into it, let’s quickly qualify who the the oldest people in the world are that we’re referring to.

For those in the US, the city in Loma Linda, California, has been dubbed the ‘Blue Zone’ and it is populated by a number of Seventh-day Adventists – a Protestant Christian denomination commonly known for avoiding alcohol and smoking and observing a meat-free diet.

Residents of Loma Linda are also accompanied by their senior counterparts in Costa Rica, Greece and Japan, each home to regions where the locals are more likely to live to 100 – in fact, they’re 10 times more likely than the average American to become a centenarian.

Glam-ma's know what they're doing and how to strive for longevity (Getty stock)

Glam-ma’s know what they’re doing and how to strive for longevity (Getty stock)

So, what should you have for breakfast if you’re looking for longevity?

If you are to follow in the footsteps of most senior of all seniors in the world… you should dish up a bowl of oatmeal. Every. Single. Day.

The late Marge Jetton, who lived in the Loma Linda’s Blue Zone until she was 105, explained to researchers her daily routine.

An extract from the study read: “Marge Jetton age 105 woke up every morning at 5:30 am read her Bible, had a breakfast of slow cook oatmeal, nuts, and dates with soymilk and a prune juice shooter.

“She would then ride her stationary bike for 30 minutes and get in her Cadillac and drive to her volunteer jobs for 7 different organizations.”

A hot steamy bowl of porridge could the answer your heart is looking for (Getty stock)

A hot steamy bowl of porridge could the answer your heart is looking for (Getty stock)

Oatmeal has a number of health benefits, including lowering cholesterol and improving your heart.

WebMD writes: “Oatmeal is nutritionally rich. It has more protein than most grains and also contains numerous vitamins and minerals. It contains antioxidants and a soluble fiber called beta-glucan, which aids several systems of the body.”

While a study of 2,000 adults in the UK, commissioned by milk alternative brand, Wunda, proved that oats are already a staple in a lot of young people’s diets.

Research found that 18 to 24 year olds consume the most porridge of all age ranges, with 39 percent of them doing so, while prepping overnight oats to eat the following morning is also frequent with 33 percent of the same age range doing so.

If that’s anything to go by then Gen Z is heading in the right direction.

World’s oldest people all eat this one ‘superfood’ for breakfast and it’s actually quite common Read More
Disturbing reason why Guinness World Records stopped allowing people to attempt world's longest kiss

Disturbing reason why Guinness World Records stopped allowing people to attempt world’s longest kiss

Disturbing reason why Guinness World Records stopped allowing people to attempt world's longest kiss

The record company launched a new record to replace the world’s longest kiss

Lots of people would happily lose an afternoon to smooching their partner – assuming they hadn’t just devoured some sour cream and onion chips – but actual attempts for the world’s longest kiss had to be scrapped by Guinness World Records for a concerning reason.

Once upon a time, the ‘World’s Longest Kiss’ record was up for grabs, ready to be bestowed upon whichever two people could successfully keep their lips locked the longest.

In 2013, those two people were Ekkachai and Laksana Tiranarat; a Thai couple who had entered a competition for the world’s longest kiss held by Ripley’s Believe It or Not! in Pattaya, Thailand.

Ah, romance (PORNCHAI KITTIWONGSAKUL/AFP via Getty Images)

Ah, romance (PORNCHAI KITTIWONGSAKUL/AFP via Getty Images)

The rules of the record

As per Guinness World Records, were as follows:

  • The kiss must be continuous and the lips must be touching at all times. If the lips part, the couple are immediately disqualified.
  • Contestants may consume liquids via a straw during the attempt, but again, the lips must not part.
  • The couple must be awake at all times.
  • The contestants must stand during the attempt and cannot be propped together by any aids.
  • No rest breaks are allowed.
  • Adult nappies/diapers or incontinence pads are not allowed to be worn.

Couples attempting to break the record were allowed to take trips to the toilet, but they had to remain kissing the whole time while also being monitored by a referee.

It’s probably not the kind of scenario many couples would be prepared to encounter during their relationship, but these contestants were obviously OK with it.

Ekkachai and Laksana Tiranarat are the last record holders (PORNCHAI KITTIWONGSAKUL/AFP via Getty Images)

Ekkachai and Laksana Tiranarat are the last record holders (PORNCHAI KITTIWONGSAKUL/AFP via Getty Images)

The event kicked off on February 12, 2013, with nine couples – including one couple in their 70s, who dropped out after an hour and 38 minutes because the husband couldn’t stand up any longer.

But Ekkachai and Laksana stayed strong, and 58 hours and 35 minutes later, they officially held the record for the world’s longest kiss. The couple won the grand prize of 100,000 Thai Baht ($2,967), as well as two diamond rings also worth 100,000 Baht.

It’s an incredible feat – especially with the logistics of going to the bathroom – but after Ekkachai and Laksana set the record Guinness realized that it was too risky to continue.

Kissing comes with some health risks (Getty Stock Image)

Kissing comes with some health risks (Getty Stock Image)

Why? Well, as determined contestants fought to continue their kiss, they became subject to dangers associated with sleep deprivation, such as psychosis.

One example of this occurred in 1999, when record holders Karmit Tzubera and Dror Orpaz almost fainted after securing the record with a kiss which lasted 30 hours and 45 minutes and had to be rushed to the hospital to be treated for fatigue.

In 2004, another contestant suffered muscle cramps during the attempt and needed his partner to massage him to help him deal with the pain. After 31 hours and 18 minutes of kissing, he then had to be resuscitated with oxygen.

So Guinness scrapped the record for the sake of people’s health – but if you still fancy trying to secure a title for tonsil tennis, there is the ‘longest kissing marathon’ record, which does permit rest breaks.

Disturbing reason why Guinness World Records stopped allowing people to attempt world’s longest kiss Read More
Married couple reveal exactly how they became Pornhub's most viewed amateurs

Married couple reveal exactly how they became Pornhub’s most viewed amateurs

Married couple reveal exactly how they became Pornhub's most viewed amateurs

Yiny and Leon don’t consider themselves adult film stars, despite their success

Pornhub’s most-viewed amateurs of 2022 racked up over 1.2 billion views and opened up about the key to their success.

If you’ve been married for a while, you may be looking for a way to spice up your love life and one couple certainly decided to do just that – but just in full view of the internet too.

And not just once or twice, but over 250 times! Yiny, 38 and Leon, 42 – who go by the name Yinyleon – uploaded hundreds of videos to the adult film site within just four years of entering the world of adult entertainment.

The videos ended up racking in some serious numbers too, obtaining more than 1.2 billion views so much so, the pair were named Pornhub’s most-viewed amateur model of the year for the second time in 2022.

The adult film stars later opened up about why they believe they’re so successful, joking while they’re both just ‘very horny’ there’s definitely a lot more that goes into their videos than just that.

Speaking to BuzzFeed News, the couple said they ventured into the adult industry after watching a YouTube video of another couple talking about their success in it.

(Instagram/@yinyleon)

(Instagram/@yinyleon)

“We were always very sexual, and we said, ‘Let’s do porn’,” said Yiny.

In their first month they made more than $2,000 and they went on to amass between $15,000 and $25,000 a month.

Leon said at the time: “It’s ridiculous. I was in the military for 13 years, but I left because what I made in the Army in a year, here I make in a month and a half, two months.”

The pair reveal it’s their outdoor videos which helped them stand out most – filming themselves having sex in the middle of a run or hike.

And it’s clearly paid off too, the category having grown 121 percent in 2022, according to Pornhub.

However, despite their success, Leon doesn’t ‘consider’ himself a porn star, noting: “It’s never going to be my intention to try to look professional or anything. But thank God people say, ‘Wow, what great production you guys have’. Really, it’s just us with a cellphone.”

Yiny added: “I think that’s why we rose to the top — because everything looks so real, the ladies are so comfy on the grass, while we’re on top of rocks, trees…anywhere.”
Married couple reveal exactly how they became Pornhub’s most viewed amateurs Read More
Scientists reveal when Jesus was really born and say it's not what people think

Scientists reveal when Jesus was really born and say it’s not what people think

Scientists reveal when Jesus was really born and say it's not what people think

December 25 marks the 2,023rd birthday of Jesus, according to many religious beliefs

Scientists have revealed when Jesus was really born, and it’s certainly not the date you’d expect.

With Christmas fast approaching and millions getting into the festive spirit with parties, presents and turkey, the big day represents a deeper meaning for many.

For many, December 25 marks the 2,023rd birthday of Jesus Christ – but the reality, according to some experts, is that Jesus wasn’t born on that certain day in December.

While we don’t know for sure, researched detailed in the MailOnline suggest that Jesus may have been born during the spring, throwing curveballs into everything many have believed for so many years.

Jesus may not have been born on December 25 after all (Wikipedia Commons)
Jesus may not have been born on December 25 after all (Wikipedia Commons)

On top of that, experts are suggesting Jesus may be a lot older than we all think, and the fact there’s no reason to believe Jesus Christ was born on Christmas Day.

Speaking to the MailOnline, Professor Lawrence Mykytiuk of Purdue University in Indiana said: “It remains a humbling fact that despite various claims, no one in modern times is really certain of the exact year of Jesus’ birth.”

Historian Flavius Josephus told the outlet that there was a lunar eclipse shortly before King Herod the Great of Judea died.

How does this look into Jesus?

Well, according to the bible, Herod said that all Jewish boys under the age of two must be killed.

While we can still not confirm this as a definite, it would suggest Jesus was born at least 24 months before King Herod’s death.

As for potential death dates of the king, according to experts these are: December 29, 1 BC, January 10, 1 BC, March 13, 4 BC and September 15, 5 BC.

Jesus Christ may have been born in the spring (Getty Stock Photo)

Jesus Christ may have been born in the spring (Getty Stock Photo)

Professor Mykytiuk added: “Josephus also tells us in two places that the Jewish Passover occurred soon after the death of Herod the Great. Because the Passover is observed in the spring; September, January, and December are ruled out.”

The professor continued: “It is most unlikely that Jesus was born on any day in December, let alone on December 25th, because ‘there were shepherds living out in the field, keeping watch over their flocks at night’.

“During winter, shepherds kept sheep in the fold to protect themselves and their sheep from severe weather. This fact of plentiful grass in March fits with the lunar eclipse occurring shortly before the death of Herod the Great.

“The narrowest date one can confidently arrive at for Jesus’s birth seems to be the month of March, during the years 6, 5, or 4 BC.”

Scientists reveal when Jesus was really born and say it’s not what people think Read More