The house in Albuquerque, which served as Walter White’s (Bryan Cranston) abode in the TV series, went up for $4 million.

However, the property looks completely different now to how fans would have remembered it; firstly, there’s no pizza on the roof and secondly, the owners have put fences up and blockades out the front – and that’s for a good reason.

But one interaction changed everything for her family back in 2006, as Quintana explained to KOB 4: “My mother never ever answers the door, and she did.

“They introduced themselves and handed her a card and said, ‘We would like to use your house for a pilot.’ And she’s like, ‘You want to buy a bridge in Brooklyn? What are you talking about?’”

Just two weeks later, once they’d confirmed the project was legit, they opened their door to filming.

“We were, like anybody, it’s a once in a lifetime thing. You got to meet the actors, the actresses, you got to see how they set up the equipment and what it all takes,” she added.

The house only served as the exterior, while the inside shots were filmed on a proper set, but it offered Quintana and her family a window into Hollywood ‘magic’.

She recalled how her mom used to offer the crew cookies, adding: “Aaron Paul had to grunt and get angry to get into his character of Jesse. What was funny was Bryan Cranston could not eat not one cookie.

“Because he had cancer in the show, so he was losing weight. So he would pass, but everybody, all the directors, all the writers would eat the cookies.

“The last day of shooting, he takes a picture holding my mom’s biscotti because he finally got to eat her cookies.”

However, the magic soon wore off as Breaking Bad fans began to show up outside the house to take pictures, or attempt to throw a pizza up there themselves – which even garnered the attention of creator Vince Gilligan, who didn’t find it humorous at all.

Joanne Quintana said she’s selling her family home, the famous house from Breaking Bad (KOB-TV)

“Let me tell you, there is nothing funny or original or cool about throwing pizzas on this lady’s roof. It is just not funny. It’s been done before. You’re not the first.” he said (via The Independent).

However, things became scary when a package addressed to Walter White was delivered to their door, which led them to install a fence and security cameras.

“My brothers said, that’s it, we’re done, fence is going up. That’s too close for comfort, the front door.” Quintana said.

Now, with 300 cars showing up at their home every day, according to Quintana, her family have decided to place the home on the market – which Zillow values at under $350,000, PEOPLE reports.

“There’s no reason to fight anymore.”

While old buildings are often a stunning type of architecture, they can sometimes be filed with eerie discoveries from the past.

TikTok user Mystee (@mysteeipong) took to the video-sharing platform to document the moment she and her husband found a hidden area with their New York home. Watch what they found below:

Mystee’s husband, Ken, decided to join in with the fun in the basement, as the pair began to unearth the ‘interesting history’ behind what was found.

The social media influencer told her followers that Ken and his family ‘has some experience with very creepy stuff’ that she insisted would help.

In the viral video uploaded last week, Mystee – who is ‘super interested in the history’ – revealed her rather strange findings.

It entails a closed-up door in her basement, which leads to a room.

“You can even see a doorway around it,” she said in the TikTok video.

Despite their apparent experience in the area, the couple did not exactly have the tools to deal with such a situation.

“Luckily they are cinder blocks so they are hollow on the inside, we got through the first part but we have yet to get through the second part,” she said.

“The reason why we haven’t been able to get through is because this room is filled with rocks.”

The TikToker made an eerie discovery (TikTok/@mysteeipong)

Mystee decided to dig for answers and she quickly found out the room in her home may have been previously linked to a tunnel.

“I didn’t know that my house had ties to the underground railroad,” she said, adding: “We looked up Clarkson and sure enough, eight minutes away there is a station.”

Viewers have flocked to the comments section of the TikTok video, with many spooked by the footage.

“I have never been so creeped out and invested at the same time,” one person wrote.

“Am I the only one that thinks that room is sealed off for a reason?” a second added.

While a third remarked: “Keep the sage burning, there’s no telling what will be released from there.”

Decisions, decisions, decisions. They rule out everyday lives, from the big deal stuff like relationships and jobs to the mundane, such as what to cook for dinner or what to wear to a party.

Making decisions can be difficult for a myriad of reasons, like fear of making the wrong choice while strong emotions can sometimes influence how we feel in the moment.

As the famous American psychologist and philosopher William James once said: “There is no more miserable human being than one in whom nothing is habitual but indecision.”

Indeed, grappling with indecision can leave many of us feeling paralyzed as even the most simple tasks can become arduous to sign-off on.

Fortunately, Paul Glimcher, a New York Professor of Neuroscience and Physiology from Massachusetts, has revealed there is a simple strategy we can all pick up to start making wiser choices.

His 2022 research paper titled ‘Efficiently irrational: deciphering the riddle of human choice’, discusses how people struggle to answer questions or solve problems when asked to pick between more than four options.

Neuroscientist Paul Glimcher has the answers (Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

Glimcher says this is because we can lose sight of what to do when comparing every option – even if a part of us already knows the best answer.

According to the study, a process called ‘divisive normalization’ is used to weigh out the pros and cons of a decision based on the informational context for ‘maximal efficiency per action potential in decision systems’.

For instance, if you’re presented with six candy bars, the neuroscientist said that your favorite candy might send a ‘lesser signal’ to your brain because it’s being ‘sucked down by just the existence of other candy bars’, which in your mind, are a much worse choice, CNBC reports.

Speaking at the Fast Company Innovation Festival last month, the professor further explained: “If I ask you to take away the worst candy bar, then your next-worst candy bar … [eventually] you’re getting more and more confident about what the best option is.”

And while that might seem like an obvious answer, Glimcher says it’ll help better mitigate ‘decision fatigue’ when it comes to making everyday decisions – though he added to CNBC that it also marginally increases it, too.

Glimcher broke down the concept by using candy as an example (Getty Images)

Experts also stress other factors can be an influence, as AMA suggests that time of day, developing habits, and seeking medical assistance can also help alievate ‘decision fatigue’.

According to Glimcher, ‘picking the best and eliminating the worst’ is what humans are ‘just good at’, as our brain can have a strong reaction to what it finds more attractive – it’s pretty self-explanatory.

However, it becomes less simple if there are too many options to choose from.

An overload of choice presents a new challenge as while the decisions are easier, the process takes longer as there are more decisions to be made.

Using the analogy of a monkey choosing between two cups, Glimcher says it’s more challenging to distinguish between the amount of neurons firing off in your brain, so the brain avoids this by reevaluate the offers presented to find ‘the new choice’, The Atlantic reports.

He continued: “When we get into modern circumstances where large companies are producing huge numbers of options for us to choose among … it has a huge effect on your performance.”

That’s what happened to Daniel Levene when he found a little bit more money than he expected.

Most of us wake up to a notification or two, maybe a spam email and a missed call from mom, but this New Yorker had a very big surprise.

Levene is a Manhattan venture capitalist who thought he had struck it lucky when he checked his account one morning in April 2023.

He logged onto his computer for business as usual, and checked his bank balance.

A former Goldman Sachs bond trader, he found many more zeroes in his account than he expected.

The major windfall had been deposited by E-Trade Financial Corporation. A subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, the corporation offers an electronic trading platform to trade financial assets.

So just how much was in his bank? Well, Levene had $89,900,912 flashing before his eyes.

The stunned man asked the question any of us would be asking: “Did I just win the lottery?”

Next, he decided to call a friend to share the ‘good news’, and joked: “Let’s go to Monaco, buy a yacht, and watch the Grand Prix.”

He wondered if he’d won the lottery (Getty Stock Image)

What would your first thought be if you thought you were rich? Unfortunately, if it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

Recalling the fateful day to The New York Post, Levene confessed: “Obviously, I knew it was a mistake.”

His next step was to contact an E-Trade customer service rep to try and get to the bottom of it.

He sent an email to the – no doubt equally shocked – agent with a photo of his monster bank balance.

In an understated fashion, Levene wrote: “This is interesting – Please call me IMMEDIATELY – Did I just win the Lottery???”

Now you’d be forgiven for thinking that a company would notice a missing $89 million pretty quickly – but it doesn’t seem so.

Levene quickly admitted something was wrong (Getty Stock Image)

Instead of replying in minutes, or calling Daniel ‘IMMEDIATELY’ as he had requested, they actually took more than an hour to get back to him and sort the return.

The company apologized profusely for dashing Levene’s financial hopes and dreams, but they didn’t immediately offer up an explanation.

A representative for E-Trade said they ‘did not process any wire transfers anywhere in the neighborhood of what is being suggested’.

They insisted that if such an unusual case were to happen, the company would ‘always work closely with that customer to resolve the issue’.

“In such a case, no funds would have left the firm,” they added.

Maybe Levene should have just kept quiet about his newfound wealth…